Wow ... didnt notice the forest coverage part, as it had losses highlighted first ... yes, pretty much enough detail. Species can be tricky, but the one presentation you showed (where they presented OT as means of showing off forest-losses of particular regions for the future theoretical global warming progress) were saying something about some data-banks, they're probably not in such a manner, like this coverage map, but im positive, such thing could be doable, if this one is in such good shape .... fingers crossed for ya !